Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring

Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification

Jessica Heinzelman, Patrick Meier

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate information is a foundational element of human rights work. Collecting and presenting factual evidence of violations is critical to the success of advocacy activities and the reputation of organizations reporting on abuses. To ensure credibility, human rights monitoring has historically been conducted through highly controlled organizational structures that face mounting challenges in terms of capacity, cost, and access. The proliferation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) provide new opportunities to overcome some of these challenges through crowdsourcing. At the same time, however, crowdsourcing raises new challenges of verification and information overload that have made human rights professionals skeptical of their utility. This chapter explores whether the efficiencies gained through an open call for monitoring and reporting abuses provides a net gain for human rights monitoring and analyzes the opportunities and challenges that new and traditional methods pose for verifying crowdsourced human rights reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHuman Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
PublisherIGI Global
Pages409-424
Number of pages16
Volume1
ISBN (Print)9781466664340, 1466664339, 9781466664333
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

information collection
human rights
monitoring
abuse
organizational structure
credibility
reputation
proliferation
communication technology
information technology
Human Rights
Monitoring
efficiency
costs
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Heinzelman, J., & Meier, P. (2014). Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring: Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification. In Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 409-424). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024

Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring : Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification. / Heinzelman, Jessica; Meier, Patrick.

Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Vol. 1 IGI Global, 2014. p. 409-424.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Heinzelman, J & Meier, P 2014, Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring: Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification. in Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. vol. 1, IGI Global, pp. 409-424. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024
Heinzelman J, Meier P. Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring: Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification. In Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Vol. 1. IGI Global. 2014. p. 409-424 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024
Heinzelman, Jessica ; Meier, Patrick. / Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring : Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification. Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Vol. 1 IGI Global, 2014. pp. 409-424
@inbook{4e137b2527be4e06bf1ad3106d0f06fc,
title = "Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring: Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification",
abstract = "Accurate information is a foundational element of human rights work. Collecting and presenting factual evidence of violations is critical to the success of advocacy activities and the reputation of organizations reporting on abuses. To ensure credibility, human rights monitoring has historically been conducted through highly controlled organizational structures that face mounting challenges in terms of capacity, cost, and access. The proliferation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) provide new opportunities to overcome some of these challenges through crowdsourcing. At the same time, however, crowdsourcing raises new challenges of verification and information overload that have made human rights professionals skeptical of their utility. This chapter explores whether the efficiencies gained through an open call for monitoring and reporting abuses provides a net gain for human rights monitoring and analyzes the opportunities and challenges that new and traditional methods pose for verifying crowdsourced human rights reporting.",
author = "Jessica Heinzelman and Patrick Meier",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781466664340",
volume = "1",
pages = "409--424",
booktitle = "Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications",
publisher = "IGI Global",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Crowdsourcing for human rights monitoring

T2 - Challenges and opportunities for information collection and verification

AU - Heinzelman, Jessica

AU - Meier, Patrick

PY - 2014/9/30

Y1 - 2014/9/30

N2 - Accurate information is a foundational element of human rights work. Collecting and presenting factual evidence of violations is critical to the success of advocacy activities and the reputation of organizations reporting on abuses. To ensure credibility, human rights monitoring has historically been conducted through highly controlled organizational structures that face mounting challenges in terms of capacity, cost, and access. The proliferation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) provide new opportunities to overcome some of these challenges through crowdsourcing. At the same time, however, crowdsourcing raises new challenges of verification and information overload that have made human rights professionals skeptical of their utility. This chapter explores whether the efficiencies gained through an open call for monitoring and reporting abuses provides a net gain for human rights monitoring and analyzes the opportunities and challenges that new and traditional methods pose for verifying crowdsourced human rights reporting.

AB - Accurate information is a foundational element of human rights work. Collecting and presenting factual evidence of violations is critical to the success of advocacy activities and the reputation of organizations reporting on abuses. To ensure credibility, human rights monitoring has historically been conducted through highly controlled organizational structures that face mounting challenges in terms of capacity, cost, and access. The proliferation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) provide new opportunities to overcome some of these challenges through crowdsourcing. At the same time, however, crowdsourcing raises new challenges of verification and information overload that have made human rights professionals skeptical of their utility. This chapter explores whether the efficiencies gained through an open call for monitoring and reporting abuses provides a net gain for human rights monitoring and analyzes the opportunities and challenges that new and traditional methods pose for verifying crowdsourced human rights reporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945392602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945392602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024

DO - 10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch024

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781466664340

SN - 1466664339

SN - 9781466664333

VL - 1

SP - 409

EP - 424

BT - Human Rights and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications

PB - IGI Global

ER -