Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys

Khalid Masood, Beena Ahmed, Jongyong Choi, Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Stress has been attributed to physiological and psychological demands that exceed the natural regulatory capacity of a person. Chronic stress is not only a catalyst for diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, insomnia but may also lead to social problems such as marriage breakups, suicide and violence. Objective assessment of stress is difficult so self-reports are commonly used to indicate the severity of stress. However, empirical information on the validity of self-reports is limited. The present study investigated the authenticity and validity of different self-report surveys. An analysis, based on a three-pronged strategy, was performed on these surveys. It was concluded that although subjects are prone to systematic error in reporting, self-reports can provide a useful substitute for data modeling specifically in stress evaluation where other objective assessments such as determination of stress using only physiological response are difficult.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012
Pages4895-4898
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2012 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: 28 Aug 20121 Sep 2012

Other

Other34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2012
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period28/8/121/9/12

Fingerprint

Stress measurement
Self Report
Social Problems
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Marriage
Violence
Suicide
Systematic errors
Medical problems
Psychology
Hypertension
Data structures
Surveys and Questionnaires
Catalysts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Signal Processing
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Masood, K., Ahmed, B., Choi, J., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2012). Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012 (pp. 4895-4898). [6347091] https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091

Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys. / Masood, Khalid; Ahmed, Beena; Choi, Jongyong; Gutierrez-Osuna, Ricardo.

2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012. 2012. p. 4895-4898 6347091.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Masood, K, Ahmed, B, Choi, J & Gutierrez-Osuna, R 2012, Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys. in 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012., 6347091, pp. 4895-4898, 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2012, San Diego, CA, United States, 28/8/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091
Masood K, Ahmed B, Choi J, Gutierrez-Osuna R. Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012. 2012. p. 4895-4898. 6347091 https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091
Masood, Khalid ; Ahmed, Beena ; Choi, Jongyong ; Gutierrez-Osuna, Ricardo. / Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012. 2012. pp. 4895-4898
@inproceedings{88f6558a330b48ef8c1c2cc5eddf2f5e,
title = "Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys",
abstract = "Stress has been attributed to physiological and psychological demands that exceed the natural regulatory capacity of a person. Chronic stress is not only a catalyst for diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, insomnia but may also lead to social problems such as marriage breakups, suicide and violence. Objective assessment of stress is difficult so self-reports are commonly used to indicate the severity of stress. However, empirical information on the validity of self-reports is limited. The present study investigated the authenticity and validity of different self-report surveys. An analysis, based on a three-pronged strategy, was performed on these surveys. It was concluded that although subjects are prone to systematic error in reporting, self-reports can provide a useful substitute for data modeling specifically in stress evaluation where other objective assessments such as determination of stress using only physiological response are difficult.",
author = "Khalid Masood and Beena Ahmed and Jongyong Choi and Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781424441198",
pages = "4895--4898",
booktitle = "2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Consistency and validity of self-reporting scores in stress measurement surveys

AU - Masood, Khalid

AU - Ahmed, Beena

AU - Choi, Jongyong

AU - Gutierrez-Osuna, Ricardo

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Stress has been attributed to physiological and psychological demands that exceed the natural regulatory capacity of a person. Chronic stress is not only a catalyst for diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, insomnia but may also lead to social problems such as marriage breakups, suicide and violence. Objective assessment of stress is difficult so self-reports are commonly used to indicate the severity of stress. However, empirical information on the validity of self-reports is limited. The present study investigated the authenticity and validity of different self-report surveys. An analysis, based on a three-pronged strategy, was performed on these surveys. It was concluded that although subjects are prone to systematic error in reporting, self-reports can provide a useful substitute for data modeling specifically in stress evaluation where other objective assessments such as determination of stress using only physiological response are difficult.

AB - Stress has been attributed to physiological and psychological demands that exceed the natural regulatory capacity of a person. Chronic stress is not only a catalyst for diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, insomnia but may also lead to social problems such as marriage breakups, suicide and violence. Objective assessment of stress is difficult so self-reports are commonly used to indicate the severity of stress. However, empirical information on the validity of self-reports is limited. The present study investigated the authenticity and validity of different self-report surveys. An analysis, based on a three-pronged strategy, was performed on these surveys. It was concluded that although subjects are prone to systematic error in reporting, self-reports can provide a useful substitute for data modeling specifically in stress evaluation where other objective assessments such as determination of stress using only physiological response are difficult.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870809618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870809618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091

DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347091

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781424441198

SP - 4895

EP - 4898

BT - 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012

ER -