Comparison of two- and three-dimensional model simulation of the effect of a tidal barrier on the Gulf of Maine tides

P. V. Sucsy, B. R. Pearce, Vijay Panchang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional tide models were used to simulate the M2 tide in the Gulf of Maine. Model estimates of changes to the tide caused by a tidal barrier in the upper Bay of Fundy were made and compared. Tidal amplitudes in the presence of a barrier increased 30-50 cm for both models. The three-dimensional model uniformly produced postbarrier elevations of 3.5 cm less than the two-dimensional model. Root-mean-square errors of M2 tidal amplitude and phase at 45 locations in the Gulf of Maine were 7.9 cm and 6° for the two-dimensional model and 5.7 cm and 7° for the three-dimensional model. -from Authors

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1231-1248
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Physical Oceanography
Volume23
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

tide
simulation
effect
gulf
comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography

Cite this

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional model simulation of the effect of a tidal barrier on the Gulf of Maine tides. / Sucsy, P. V.; Pearce, B. R.; Panchang, Vijay.

In: Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1993, p. 1231-1248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38882a8b7c82407c86ea94b8b11791f9,
title = "Comparison of two- and three-dimensional model simulation of the effect of a tidal barrier on the Gulf of Maine tides",
abstract = "Two-dimensional and three-dimensional tide models were used to simulate the M2 tide in the Gulf of Maine. Model estimates of changes to the tide caused by a tidal barrier in the upper Bay of Fundy were made and compared. Tidal amplitudes in the presence of a barrier increased 30-50 cm for both models. The three-dimensional model uniformly produced postbarrier elevations of 3.5 cm less than the two-dimensional model. Root-mean-square errors of M2 tidal amplitude and phase at 45 locations in the Gulf of Maine were 7.9 cm and 6° for the two-dimensional model and 5.7 cm and 7° for the three-dimensional model. -from Authors",
author = "Sucsy, {P. V.} and Pearce, {B. R.} and Vijay Panchang",
year = "1993",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1231--1248",
journal = "Journal of Physical Oceanography",
issn = "0022-3670",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two- and three-dimensional model simulation of the effect of a tidal barrier on the Gulf of Maine tides

AU - Sucsy, P. V.

AU - Pearce, B. R.

AU - Panchang, Vijay

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Two-dimensional and three-dimensional tide models were used to simulate the M2 tide in the Gulf of Maine. Model estimates of changes to the tide caused by a tidal barrier in the upper Bay of Fundy were made and compared. Tidal amplitudes in the presence of a barrier increased 30-50 cm for both models. The three-dimensional model uniformly produced postbarrier elevations of 3.5 cm less than the two-dimensional model. Root-mean-square errors of M2 tidal amplitude and phase at 45 locations in the Gulf of Maine were 7.9 cm and 6° for the two-dimensional model and 5.7 cm and 7° for the three-dimensional model. -from Authors

AB - Two-dimensional and three-dimensional tide models were used to simulate the M2 tide in the Gulf of Maine. Model estimates of changes to the tide caused by a tidal barrier in the upper Bay of Fundy were made and compared. Tidal amplitudes in the presence of a barrier increased 30-50 cm for both models. The three-dimensional model uniformly produced postbarrier elevations of 3.5 cm less than the two-dimensional model. Root-mean-square errors of M2 tidal amplitude and phase at 45 locations in the Gulf of Maine were 7.9 cm and 6° for the two-dimensional model and 5.7 cm and 7° for the three-dimensional model. -from Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027811451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027811451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1231

EP - 1248

JO - Journal of Physical Oceanography

JF - Journal of Physical Oceanography

SN - 0022-3670

IS - 6

ER -