COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS.

D. R. Baer, D. A. Petersen, L. R. Pederson, M. T. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The surface composition and elemental depth profiles of native oxide films formed on amorphous FeCrNiPB alloys (METGLAS 2826A) have been investigated using both Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Although both AES and XPS are surface sensitive techniques, differences in electron escape depths for various Auger and photoelectron peaks result in different sample volumes being analyzed by the two methods. This is found to be significant for specimens that have thin surface films with a varying elemental depth composition such as passive layers. Standard XPS and AES analysis of the data from the surface films using either published or bulk normalized sensitivity factors gave different results for the film composition from the two techniques. In addition, AES and XPS sputter profiles were dissimilar. A ″true″ depth profile was constructed using an iterative method, considering escape depth broadening effects and the measured profiles. Model calculations of XPS and AES film compositions based on this profile reproduce the differences observed in the experimental XPS and AES data, showing that it is difficult to determine the content of a complex film without some type of depth analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)957-961
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of vacuum science & technology
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Auger electron spectroscopy
Photoelectron spectroscopy
X rays
Chemical analysis
Amorphous alloys
Photoelectrons
Iterative methods
Surface structure
Oxide films
Electrons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Baer, D. R., Petersen, D. A., Pederson, L. R., & Thomas, M. T. (1981). COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS. Journal of vacuum science & technology, 20(4), 957-961. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.571652

COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS. / Baer, D. R.; Petersen, D. A.; Pederson, L. R.; Thomas, M. T.

In: Journal of vacuum science & technology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.1981, p. 957-961.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baer, DR, Petersen, DA, Pederson, LR & Thomas, MT 1981, 'COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS.', Journal of vacuum science & technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 957-961. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.571652
Baer, D. R. ; Petersen, D. A. ; Pederson, L. R. ; Thomas, M. T. / COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS. In: Journal of vacuum science & technology. 1981 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 957-961.
@article{0f400e2ecde9485ba1dbd82ca27aabfb,
title = "COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS.",
abstract = "The surface composition and elemental depth profiles of native oxide films formed on amorphous FeCrNiPB alloys (METGLAS 2826A) have been investigated using both Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Although both AES and XPS are surface sensitive techniques, differences in electron escape depths for various Auger and photoelectron peaks result in different sample volumes being analyzed by the two methods. This is found to be significant for specimens that have thin surface films with a varying elemental depth composition such as passive layers. Standard XPS and AES analysis of the data from the surface films using either published or bulk normalized sensitivity factors gave different results for the film composition from the two techniques. In addition, AES and XPS sputter profiles were dissimilar. A ″true″ depth profile was constructed using an iterative method, considering escape depth broadening effects and the measured profiles. Model calculations of XPS and AES film compositions based on this profile reproduce the differences observed in the experimental XPS and AES data, showing that it is difficult to determine the content of a complex film without some type of depth analysis.",
author = "Baer, {D. R.} and Petersen, {D. A.} and Pederson, {L. R.} and Thomas, {M. T.}",
year = "1981",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1116/1.571652",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "957--961",
journal = "Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology",
issn = "0022-5355",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMPARISON OF AES AND XPS ANALYSIS OF THIN PASSIVE FILMS.

AU - Baer, D. R.

AU - Petersen, D. A.

AU - Pederson, L. R.

AU - Thomas, M. T.

PY - 1981/4

Y1 - 1981/4

N2 - The surface composition and elemental depth profiles of native oxide films formed on amorphous FeCrNiPB alloys (METGLAS 2826A) have been investigated using both Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Although both AES and XPS are surface sensitive techniques, differences in electron escape depths for various Auger and photoelectron peaks result in different sample volumes being analyzed by the two methods. This is found to be significant for specimens that have thin surface films with a varying elemental depth composition such as passive layers. Standard XPS and AES analysis of the data from the surface films using either published or bulk normalized sensitivity factors gave different results for the film composition from the two techniques. In addition, AES and XPS sputter profiles were dissimilar. A ″true″ depth profile was constructed using an iterative method, considering escape depth broadening effects and the measured profiles. Model calculations of XPS and AES film compositions based on this profile reproduce the differences observed in the experimental XPS and AES data, showing that it is difficult to determine the content of a complex film without some type of depth analysis.

AB - The surface composition and elemental depth profiles of native oxide films formed on amorphous FeCrNiPB alloys (METGLAS 2826A) have been investigated using both Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Although both AES and XPS are surface sensitive techniques, differences in electron escape depths for various Auger and photoelectron peaks result in different sample volumes being analyzed by the two methods. This is found to be significant for specimens that have thin surface films with a varying elemental depth composition such as passive layers. Standard XPS and AES analysis of the data from the surface films using either published or bulk normalized sensitivity factors gave different results for the film composition from the two techniques. In addition, AES and XPS sputter profiles were dissimilar. A ″true″ depth profile was constructed using an iterative method, considering escape depth broadening effects and the measured profiles. Model calculations of XPS and AES film compositions based on this profile reproduce the differences observed in the experimental XPS and AES data, showing that it is difficult to determine the content of a complex film without some type of depth analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019550847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019550847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1116/1.571652

DO - 10.1116/1.571652

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0019550847

VL - 20

SP - 957

EP - 961

JO - Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology

JF - Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology

SN - 0022-5355

IS - 4

ER -