Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques

Lamana Mulaffer, Mostafa Shahin, Martin Glos, Thomas Penzel, Beena Ahmed

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sleep disorders are becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However most of the burgeoning research on automated sleep analysis has been in the realm of sleep stage classification with limited focus on accurately diagnosing these disorders. In this paper, we explore two different models to discriminate between control and insomnia patients using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. We validated the models using data collected from 124 participants, 70 control and 54 with insomnia. The first model uses 57 features derived from two channels of EEG data and achieved an accuracy of 81%. The second model uses 15 features from each participant's hypnogram and achieved an accuracy of 74%. The impetus behind using these two models is to follow the clinician's diagnostic decision-making process where both the EEG signals and the hypnograms are used. These results demonstrate that there is potential for further experimentation and improvement of the predictive capability of the models to help in diagnosing sleep disorders like insomnia.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Subtitle of host publicationSmarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages3749-3752
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781509028092
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2017
Event39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2017 - Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of
Duration: 11 Jul 201715 Jul 2017

Other

Other39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2017
CountryKorea, Republic of
CityJeju Island
Period11/7/1715/7/17

Fingerprint

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Electroencephalography
Sleep Stages
Decision Making
Sleep
Research
Support vector machines
Classifiers
Decision making
Sleep Wake Disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Signal Processing
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Mulaffer, L., Shahin, M., Glos, M., Penzel, T., & Ahmed, B. (2017). Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques. In 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Smarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings (pp. 3749-3752). [8037672] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672

Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques. / Mulaffer, Lamana; Shahin, Mostafa; Glos, Martin; Penzel, Thomas; Ahmed, Beena.

2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Smarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. p. 3749-3752 8037672.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Mulaffer, L, Shahin, M, Glos, M, Penzel, T & Ahmed, B 2017, Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques. in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Smarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings., 8037672, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 3749-3752, 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2017, Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of, 11/7/17. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672
Mulaffer L, Shahin M, Glos M, Penzel T, Ahmed B. Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques. In 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Smarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2017. p. 3749-3752. 8037672 https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672
Mulaffer, Lamana ; Shahin, Mostafa ; Glos, Martin ; Penzel, Thomas ; Ahmed, Beena. / Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Smarter Technology for a Healthier World, EMBC 2017 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. pp. 3749-3752
@inproceedings{873e009b529a4103933729f101cd8866,
title = "Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques",
abstract = "Sleep disorders are becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However most of the burgeoning research on automated sleep analysis has been in the realm of sleep stage classification with limited focus on accurately diagnosing these disorders. In this paper, we explore two different models to discriminate between control and insomnia patients using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. We validated the models using data collected from 124 participants, 70 control and 54 with insomnia. The first model uses 57 features derived from two channels of EEG data and achieved an accuracy of 81{\%}. The second model uses 15 features from each participant's hypnogram and achieved an accuracy of 74{\%}. The impetus behind using these two models is to follow the clinician's diagnostic decision-making process where both the EEG signals and the hypnograms are used. These results demonstrate that there is potential for further experimentation and improvement of the predictive capability of the models to help in diagnosing sleep disorders like insomnia.",
author = "Lamana Mulaffer and Mostafa Shahin and Martin Glos and Thomas Penzel and Beena Ahmed",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672",
language = "English",
pages = "3749--3752",
booktitle = "2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing two insomnia detection models of clinical diagnosis techniques

AU - Mulaffer, Lamana

AU - Shahin, Mostafa

AU - Glos, Martin

AU - Penzel, Thomas

AU - Ahmed, Beena

PY - 2017/9/13

Y1 - 2017/9/13

N2 - Sleep disorders are becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However most of the burgeoning research on automated sleep analysis has been in the realm of sleep stage classification with limited focus on accurately diagnosing these disorders. In this paper, we explore two different models to discriminate between control and insomnia patients using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. We validated the models using data collected from 124 participants, 70 control and 54 with insomnia. The first model uses 57 features derived from two channels of EEG data and achieved an accuracy of 81%. The second model uses 15 features from each participant's hypnogram and achieved an accuracy of 74%. The impetus behind using these two models is to follow the clinician's diagnostic decision-making process where both the EEG signals and the hypnograms are used. These results demonstrate that there is potential for further experimentation and improvement of the predictive capability of the models to help in diagnosing sleep disorders like insomnia.

AB - Sleep disorders are becoming increasingly prevalent in society. However most of the burgeoning research on automated sleep analysis has been in the realm of sleep stage classification with limited focus on accurately diagnosing these disorders. In this paper, we explore two different models to discriminate between control and insomnia patients using support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. We validated the models using data collected from 124 participants, 70 control and 54 with insomnia. The first model uses 57 features derived from two channels of EEG data and achieved an accuracy of 81%. The second model uses 15 features from each participant's hypnogram and achieved an accuracy of 74%. The impetus behind using these two models is to follow the clinician's diagnostic decision-making process where both the EEG signals and the hypnograms are used. These results demonstrate that there is potential for further experimentation and improvement of the predictive capability of the models to help in diagnosing sleep disorders like insomnia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032219917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032219917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672

DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037672

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 3749

EP - 3752

BT - 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -