Comparative study on toxic gas infiltration in a non-process area using CFD and multi-zone models

Atif M. Ashraf, Christos D. Argyropoulos, Tomasz Olewski, Luc Vechot, Konstantinos Kakosimos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the majority of incidents involving toxic gas release in process industries occurs outdoors, nearby buildings and indoor environments are also at high risk. Particularly, non-process areas such as administration buildings and central utility plants are often the least protected, even though they are in the vicinity of potential sources. Ingress of contaminants depends on various factors such as meteorology, building ventilation, building envelope, among others. In literature, indoor exposure modelling techniques range from simple statistical regression and mass balance approaches to more complex models such as multi-zone and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Milner et al. 2011). Therefore, to study toxic gas infiltration, a proper selection of models is required. Despite the significant risk posed by such events in process facilities, there is still a lack of data and comparative studies concerning the appropriate models and mitigation methods. This paper investigates a realistic pipeline leak in a natural gas facility and the subsequent H2S exposure of the nearby administration building. A comparative study is performed by utilizing a dispersion model (SLAB), a multi-zone model (CONTAM) and a CFD model (Quick Urban and Industrial Complex - QUIC). The influence of ventilation network, nature of openings, wind speed, direction and pressure on toxic gas ingress is examined. Furthermore, we also study the sensitivity of wind pressure calculation on the toxic gas infiltration rate by using American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbook and CFD modelling. Indoor toxic levels are attained using multiple combinations of the above mentioned models. Results on indoor toxic levels indicated high sensitivity to wind characteristics which led to varying risks and conclusions. A detailed description of studied scenarios and findings is also presented.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInstitution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series
Volume2016-January
Issue number161
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Poisons
Infiltration
Computational fluid dynamics
Gases
Ventilation
Meteorology
Air conditioning
Dynamic models
Natural gas
Pipelines
Impurities
Heating
Engineers
Industry

Keywords

  • CFD
  • Indoor airflow modelling
  • Infiltration
  • Ingress
  • Multi-zone
  • Toxic gas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Comparative study on toxic gas infiltration in a non-process area using CFD and multi-zone models. / Ashraf, Atif M.; Argyropoulos, Christos D.; Olewski, Tomasz; Vechot, Luc; Kakosimos, Konstantinos.

In: Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, Vol. 2016-January, No. 161, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ce8bf69cb744bb9a0034ab35d25cca5,
title = "Comparative study on toxic gas infiltration in a non-process area using CFD and multi-zone models",
abstract = "Although the majority of incidents involving toxic gas release in process industries occurs outdoors, nearby buildings and indoor environments are also at high risk. Particularly, non-process areas such as administration buildings and central utility plants are often the least protected, even though they are in the vicinity of potential sources. Ingress of contaminants depends on various factors such as meteorology, building ventilation, building envelope, among others. In literature, indoor exposure modelling techniques range from simple statistical regression and mass balance approaches to more complex models such as multi-zone and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Milner et al. 2011). Therefore, to study toxic gas infiltration, a proper selection of models is required. Despite the significant risk posed by such events in process facilities, there is still a lack of data and comparative studies concerning the appropriate models and mitigation methods. This paper investigates a realistic pipeline leak in a natural gas facility and the subsequent H2S exposure of the nearby administration building. A comparative study is performed by utilizing a dispersion model (SLAB), a multi-zone model (CONTAM) and a CFD model (Quick Urban and Industrial Complex - QUIC). The influence of ventilation network, nature of openings, wind speed, direction and pressure on toxic gas ingress is examined. Furthermore, we also study the sensitivity of wind pressure calculation on the toxic gas infiltration rate by using American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbook and CFD modelling. Indoor toxic levels are attained using multiple combinations of the above mentioned models. Results on indoor toxic levels indicated high sensitivity to wind characteristics which led to varying risks and conclusions. A detailed description of studied scenarios and findings is also presented.",
keywords = "CFD, Indoor airflow modelling, Infiltration, Ingress, Multi-zone, Toxic gas",
author = "Ashraf, {Atif M.} and Argyropoulos, {Christos D.} and Tomasz Olewski and Luc Vechot and Konstantinos Kakosimos",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "2016-January",
journal = "Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series",
issn = "0307-0492",
number = "161",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study on toxic gas infiltration in a non-process area using CFD and multi-zone models

AU - Ashraf, Atif M.

AU - Argyropoulos, Christos D.

AU - Olewski, Tomasz

AU - Vechot, Luc

AU - Kakosimos, Konstantinos

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although the majority of incidents involving toxic gas release in process industries occurs outdoors, nearby buildings and indoor environments are also at high risk. Particularly, non-process areas such as administration buildings and central utility plants are often the least protected, even though they are in the vicinity of potential sources. Ingress of contaminants depends on various factors such as meteorology, building ventilation, building envelope, among others. In literature, indoor exposure modelling techniques range from simple statistical regression and mass balance approaches to more complex models such as multi-zone and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Milner et al. 2011). Therefore, to study toxic gas infiltration, a proper selection of models is required. Despite the significant risk posed by such events in process facilities, there is still a lack of data and comparative studies concerning the appropriate models and mitigation methods. This paper investigates a realistic pipeline leak in a natural gas facility and the subsequent H2S exposure of the nearby administration building. A comparative study is performed by utilizing a dispersion model (SLAB), a multi-zone model (CONTAM) and a CFD model (Quick Urban and Industrial Complex - QUIC). The influence of ventilation network, nature of openings, wind speed, direction and pressure on toxic gas ingress is examined. Furthermore, we also study the sensitivity of wind pressure calculation on the toxic gas infiltration rate by using American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbook and CFD modelling. Indoor toxic levels are attained using multiple combinations of the above mentioned models. Results on indoor toxic levels indicated high sensitivity to wind characteristics which led to varying risks and conclusions. A detailed description of studied scenarios and findings is also presented.

AB - Although the majority of incidents involving toxic gas release in process industries occurs outdoors, nearby buildings and indoor environments are also at high risk. Particularly, non-process areas such as administration buildings and central utility plants are often the least protected, even though they are in the vicinity of potential sources. Ingress of contaminants depends on various factors such as meteorology, building ventilation, building envelope, among others. In literature, indoor exposure modelling techniques range from simple statistical regression and mass balance approaches to more complex models such as multi-zone and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Milner et al. 2011). Therefore, to study toxic gas infiltration, a proper selection of models is required. Despite the significant risk posed by such events in process facilities, there is still a lack of data and comparative studies concerning the appropriate models and mitigation methods. This paper investigates a realistic pipeline leak in a natural gas facility and the subsequent H2S exposure of the nearby administration building. A comparative study is performed by utilizing a dispersion model (SLAB), a multi-zone model (CONTAM) and a CFD model (Quick Urban and Industrial Complex - QUIC). The influence of ventilation network, nature of openings, wind speed, direction and pressure on toxic gas ingress is examined. Furthermore, we also study the sensitivity of wind pressure calculation on the toxic gas infiltration rate by using American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbook and CFD modelling. Indoor toxic levels are attained using multiple combinations of the above mentioned models. Results on indoor toxic levels indicated high sensitivity to wind characteristics which led to varying risks and conclusions. A detailed description of studied scenarios and findings is also presented.

KW - CFD

KW - Indoor airflow modelling

KW - Infiltration

KW - Ingress

KW - Multi-zone

KW - Toxic gas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979567286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979567286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2016-January

JO - Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series

JF - Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series

SN - 0307-0492

IS - 161

ER -