Clarifying the concept of the “Social” in risk assessments for human subjects research

Sara R. Jordan, Phillip Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

International guidelines for the conduct of research with human participants, such as those put forth by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS, 2002), recommend that research review committees account for social risk and benefits to society in their review of proposed research. What do the concepts of the “social” and “society” mean in the context of the review of human participants research? Here we analyze concepts of social and society to define the terms: social harm, social risk, social benefit, and benefits to society. We argue that use of these terms invite more questions than answers and beg for difficult empirical research to determine the nature, likelihood, and magnitude of this category of risk and benefit. Until more research is done and these questions are answered, we advise reviewers to adopt an attitude of provisionalism and caution in their review of specifically “social” risks and benefits and “benefits to society.”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

risk assessment
social benefits
International Organizations
empirical research
Society
science

Keywords

  • research benefits
  • Research risks
  • social
  • social science research
  • society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Clarifying the concept of the “Social” in risk assessments for human subjects research. / Jordan, Sara R.; Gray, Phillip.

In: Accountability in Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b859096cc18048d5884c371ad2aa3f8f,
title = "Clarifying the concept of the “Social” in risk assessments for human subjects research",
abstract = "International guidelines for the conduct of research with human participants, such as those put forth by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS, 2002), recommend that research review committees account for social risk and benefits to society in their review of proposed research. What do the concepts of the “social” and “society” mean in the context of the review of human participants research? Here we analyze concepts of social and society to define the terms: social harm, social risk, social benefit, and benefits to society. We argue that use of these terms invite more questions than answers and beg for difficult empirical research to determine the nature, likelihood, and magnitude of this category of risk and benefit. Until more research is done and these questions are answered, we advise reviewers to adopt an attitude of provisionalism and caution in their review of specifically “social” risks and benefits and “benefits to society.”.",
keywords = "research benefits, Research risks, social, social science research, society",
author = "Jordan, {Sara R.} and Phillip Gray",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2017.1403323",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clarifying the concept of the “Social” in risk assessments for human subjects research

AU - Jordan, Sara R.

AU - Gray, Phillip

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - International guidelines for the conduct of research with human participants, such as those put forth by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS, 2002), recommend that research review committees account for social risk and benefits to society in their review of proposed research. What do the concepts of the “social” and “society” mean in the context of the review of human participants research? Here we analyze concepts of social and society to define the terms: social harm, social risk, social benefit, and benefits to society. We argue that use of these terms invite more questions than answers and beg for difficult empirical research to determine the nature, likelihood, and magnitude of this category of risk and benefit. Until more research is done and these questions are answered, we advise reviewers to adopt an attitude of provisionalism and caution in their review of specifically “social” risks and benefits and “benefits to society.”.

AB - International guidelines for the conduct of research with human participants, such as those put forth by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS, 2002), recommend that research review committees account for social risk and benefits to society in their review of proposed research. What do the concepts of the “social” and “society” mean in the context of the review of human participants research? Here we analyze concepts of social and society to define the terms: social harm, social risk, social benefit, and benefits to society. We argue that use of these terms invite more questions than answers and beg for difficult empirical research to determine the nature, likelihood, and magnitude of this category of risk and benefit. Until more research is done and these questions are answered, we advise reviewers to adopt an attitude of provisionalism and caution in their review of specifically “social” risks and benefits and “benefits to society.”.

KW - research benefits

KW - Research risks

KW - social

KW - social science research

KW - society

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035813221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035813221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2017.1403323

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2017.1403323

M3 - Article

C2 - 29140730

AN - SCOPUS:85035813221

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

IS - 1

ER -