Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese

Edward M. Heath, Ted D. Adams, Maria Matthews Daines, Steven Hunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for measurement of body composition of persons who are morbidly obese. Design: Body composition was determined using 3 methods: hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and BIA. Residual volume for the hydrostatic weighing calculation was determined by body plethysmography. Subjects: Subjects were 16 morbidly obese men (142.5 kg mean body weight) and 30 morbidly obese women (125.9 kg mean body weight) living in the Salt Lake County, Utah, area. Morbid obesity was defined as 40 kg or more over ideal weight. Statistical analysis: One- way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Scheffe post hoc tests; body-fat measurement method served as the repeated variable and percentage of body fat as the dependent variable. Men and women were analyzed separately. In addition, degree of agreement between the 3 methods of determining body composition was determined. A regression equation was used to calculate body density for hydrostatic weighing without head submersion. Two new BIA regression equations were developed from the data of the 16 men and 30 women. Results: Values for percentage body fat from hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion (41.8% vs 41.7%, respectively) were the same for men but differed for women (52.2% vs 49.4%, respectively, P<.0001). Values for body fat percentage measured by BIA were significantly lower for men (36.1%) and women (43.1%) (for both, P<.0001) compared with values from hydrostatic weighing methods. BIA underpredicted percentage body fat by a mean of 5.7% in men and 9.1% in women compared with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. Applications/conclusions BIA tended to underpredict the measurement of percentage body fat in male and female subjects who were morbidly obese. Hydrostatic weighing without head submersion provides an accurate, acceptable, and convenient alternative method for body composition assessment of the morbidly obese population in comparison with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. In population screening or other settings where underwater weighing is impractical, population-specific BIA regression equations should be used because general BIA equations lead to consistent underprediction of percentage body fat compared with hydrostatic weighing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-875
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume98
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

bioelectrical impedance
Immersion
Electric Impedance
body fat
Adipose Tissue
Head
Body Composition
body composition
methodology
regression analysis
Body Weight
Regression Analysis
Population
Residual Volume
body weight
Plethysmography
Morbid Obesity
Analysis of Variance
obesity
statistical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese. / Heath, Edward M.; Adams, Ted D.; Daines, Maria Matthews; Hunt, Steven.

In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 98, No. 8, 08.1998, p. 869-875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48ad5d05684c45b2957115f4b07d68a8,
title = "Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese",
abstract = "Objective: To compare hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for measurement of body composition of persons who are morbidly obese. Design: Body composition was determined using 3 methods: hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and BIA. Residual volume for the hydrostatic weighing calculation was determined by body plethysmography. Subjects: Subjects were 16 morbidly obese men (142.5 kg mean body weight) and 30 morbidly obese women (125.9 kg mean body weight) living in the Salt Lake County, Utah, area. Morbid obesity was defined as 40 kg or more over ideal weight. Statistical analysis: One- way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Scheffe post hoc tests; body-fat measurement method served as the repeated variable and percentage of body fat as the dependent variable. Men and women were analyzed separately. In addition, degree of agreement between the 3 methods of determining body composition was determined. A regression equation was used to calculate body density for hydrostatic weighing without head submersion. Two new BIA regression equations were developed from the data of the 16 men and 30 women. Results: Values for percentage body fat from hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion (41.8{\%} vs 41.7{\%}, respectively) were the same for men but differed for women (52.2{\%} vs 49.4{\%}, respectively, P<.0001). Values for body fat percentage measured by BIA were significantly lower for men (36.1{\%}) and women (43.1{\%}) (for both, P<.0001) compared with values from hydrostatic weighing methods. BIA underpredicted percentage body fat by a mean of 5.7{\%} in men and 9.1{\%} in women compared with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. Applications/conclusions BIA tended to underpredict the measurement of percentage body fat in male and female subjects who were morbidly obese. Hydrostatic weighing without head submersion provides an accurate, acceptable, and convenient alternative method for body composition assessment of the morbidly obese population in comparison with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. In population screening or other settings where underwater weighing is impractical, population-specific BIA regression equations should be used because general BIA equations lead to consistent underprediction of percentage body fat compared with hydrostatic weighing.",
author = "Heath, {Edward M.} and Adams, {Ted D.} and Daines, {Maria Matthews} and Steven Hunt",
year = "1998",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00201-6",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "869--875",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese

AU - Heath, Edward M.

AU - Adams, Ted D.

AU - Daines, Maria Matthews

AU - Hunt, Steven

PY - 1998/8

Y1 - 1998/8

N2 - Objective: To compare hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for measurement of body composition of persons who are morbidly obese. Design: Body composition was determined using 3 methods: hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and BIA. Residual volume for the hydrostatic weighing calculation was determined by body plethysmography. Subjects: Subjects were 16 morbidly obese men (142.5 kg mean body weight) and 30 morbidly obese women (125.9 kg mean body weight) living in the Salt Lake County, Utah, area. Morbid obesity was defined as 40 kg or more over ideal weight. Statistical analysis: One- way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Scheffe post hoc tests; body-fat measurement method served as the repeated variable and percentage of body fat as the dependent variable. Men and women were analyzed separately. In addition, degree of agreement between the 3 methods of determining body composition was determined. A regression equation was used to calculate body density for hydrostatic weighing without head submersion. Two new BIA regression equations were developed from the data of the 16 men and 30 women. Results: Values for percentage body fat from hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion (41.8% vs 41.7%, respectively) were the same for men but differed for women (52.2% vs 49.4%, respectively, P<.0001). Values for body fat percentage measured by BIA were significantly lower for men (36.1%) and women (43.1%) (for both, P<.0001) compared with values from hydrostatic weighing methods. BIA underpredicted percentage body fat by a mean of 5.7% in men and 9.1% in women compared with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. Applications/conclusions BIA tended to underpredict the measurement of percentage body fat in male and female subjects who were morbidly obese. Hydrostatic weighing without head submersion provides an accurate, acceptable, and convenient alternative method for body composition assessment of the morbidly obese population in comparison with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. In population screening or other settings where underwater weighing is impractical, population-specific BIA regression equations should be used because general BIA equations lead to consistent underprediction of percentage body fat compared with hydrostatic weighing.

AB - Objective: To compare hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) for measurement of body composition of persons who are morbidly obese. Design: Body composition was determined using 3 methods: hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion and BIA. Residual volume for the hydrostatic weighing calculation was determined by body plethysmography. Subjects: Subjects were 16 morbidly obese men (142.5 kg mean body weight) and 30 morbidly obese women (125.9 kg mean body weight) living in the Salt Lake County, Utah, area. Morbid obesity was defined as 40 kg or more over ideal weight. Statistical analysis: One- way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Scheffe post hoc tests; body-fat measurement method served as the repeated variable and percentage of body fat as the dependent variable. Men and women were analyzed separately. In addition, degree of agreement between the 3 methods of determining body composition was determined. A regression equation was used to calculate body density for hydrostatic weighing without head submersion. Two new BIA regression equations were developed from the data of the 16 men and 30 women. Results: Values for percentage body fat from hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion (41.8% vs 41.7%, respectively) were the same for men but differed for women (52.2% vs 49.4%, respectively, P<.0001). Values for body fat percentage measured by BIA were significantly lower for men (36.1%) and women (43.1%) (for both, P<.0001) compared with values from hydrostatic weighing methods. BIA underpredicted percentage body fat by a mean of 5.7% in men and 9.1% in women compared with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. Applications/conclusions BIA tended to underpredict the measurement of percentage body fat in male and female subjects who were morbidly obese. Hydrostatic weighing without head submersion provides an accurate, acceptable, and convenient alternative method for body composition assessment of the morbidly obese population in comparison with the traditional hydrostatic weighing method. In population screening or other settings where underwater weighing is impractical, population-specific BIA regression equations should be used because general BIA equations lead to consistent underprediction of percentage body fat compared with hydrostatic weighing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031904339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031904339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00201-6

DO - 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00201-6

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 869

EP - 875

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 8

ER -