Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism

Richard van der Wurff, Klaus Schönbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A three-wave Delphi study in the Netherlands invited 60 experts to assess the quality of online and traditional journalism and to propose measures for improvement. Although from very different backgrounds and representing a wide range of opinions, the experts agree on a focused set of core standards to be strictly observed by journalists. They separate these rules from other important norms about which journalists and their media may justifiably hold different views. And they identify transparency and a voluntary code of conduct as two crucial instruments to strengthen compliance with these norms. Summarizing the results of the Delphi panel, we propose a voluntary but binding code for journalism in the twenty-first century.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-422
Number of pages16
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

journalism
journalist
Transparency
transparency
profession
expert
twenty-first century
Netherlands
Compliance

Keywords

  • Codes of conduct
  • Journalistic standards
  • Online news
  • Quality
  • Transparency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism. / van der Wurff, Richard; Schönbach, Klaus.

In: Journalism Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 407-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f86be1d4473b44e9a969295d330681c3,
title = "Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism",
abstract = "A three-wave Delphi study in the Netherlands invited 60 experts to assess the quality of online and traditional journalism and to propose measures for improvement. Although from very different backgrounds and representing a wide range of opinions, the experts agree on a focused set of core standards to be strictly observed by journalists. They separate these rules from other important norms about which journalists and their media may justifiably hold different views. And they identify transparency and a voluntary code of conduct as two crucial instruments to strengthen compliance with these norms. Summarizing the results of the Delphi panel, we propose a voluntary but binding code for journalism in the twenty-first century.",
keywords = "Codes of conduct, Journalistic standards, Online news, Quality, Transparency",
author = "{van der Wurff}, Richard and Klaus Sch{\"o}nbach",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2010.506055",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "407--422",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between profession and audience codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off-and online journalism

AU - van der Wurff, Richard

AU - Schönbach, Klaus

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - A three-wave Delphi study in the Netherlands invited 60 experts to assess the quality of online and traditional journalism and to propose measures for improvement. Although from very different backgrounds and representing a wide range of opinions, the experts agree on a focused set of core standards to be strictly observed by journalists. They separate these rules from other important norms about which journalists and their media may justifiably hold different views. And they identify transparency and a voluntary code of conduct as two crucial instruments to strengthen compliance with these norms. Summarizing the results of the Delphi panel, we propose a voluntary but binding code for journalism in the twenty-first century.

AB - A three-wave Delphi study in the Netherlands invited 60 experts to assess the quality of online and traditional journalism and to propose measures for improvement. Although from very different backgrounds and representing a wide range of opinions, the experts agree on a focused set of core standards to be strictly observed by journalists. They separate these rules from other important norms about which journalists and their media may justifiably hold different views. And they identify transparency and a voluntary code of conduct as two crucial instruments to strengthen compliance with these norms. Summarizing the results of the Delphi panel, we propose a voluntary but binding code for journalism in the twenty-first century.

KW - Codes of conduct

KW - Journalistic standards

KW - Online news

KW - Quality

KW - Transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960548234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960548234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2010.506055

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2010.506055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960548234

VL - 12

SP - 407

EP - 422

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 4

ER -