Benchmarking the performance of plane-wave vs. localized orbital basis set methods in DFT modeling of metal surface

a case study for Fe-(110)

Kapil Adhikari, Aurab Chakrabarty, Othmane Bouhali, Normand Mousseau, Charlotte S. Becquart, Fadwa El-Mellouhi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reproducing electronic structure of extended metallic systems is computationally demanding with the cost efficiency of this approach heavily dependent on both the density functional and the basis function used to approximate the electronic orbitals. It is well known that the generalized gradient approximation functional (GGA) is the most suitable and reliable approach for the description of metallic systems. As for the basis functions, two approaches dominate: the linear combination of localized basis functions (LB) such as Gaussian functions and the linear combination of plane waves (PW). Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, that may impact the efficiency and accuracy of the simulations. In this work, we use the VASP and the CRYSTAL14 suites of codes that employ plane waves and localized Gaussian basis sets, respectively, to establish a benchmark on their computational efficiency for the modeling of metal surfaces. The PW basis technique requires that the entire simulation box including the vacuum space be filled with plane waves which reduces the computational efficiency and limits the vacuum space. For its part, the LB method is based on atomic localized orbitals and does not require vacuum to model surfaces. Therefore, for calculations that require relatively large vacuum thickness such as modeling of adsorption, the LB method might be superior in terms of computational expense while providing the comparable accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Computational Science
Volume29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Discrete Fourier transforms
Plane Wave
Basis Functions
Metals
Vacuum
Modeling
Computational Efficiency
Linear Combination
Computational efficiency
Cost Efficiency
Generalized Gradient
Gaussian Function
Electronic Structure
Density Functional
Adsorption
Simulation
Electronic structure
Entire
Electronics

Keywords

  • CRYSTAL
  • Density functional theory
  • Localized basis sets
  • Metallic surfaces
  • Planewave basis sets
  • VASP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science(all)
  • Modelling and Simulation

Cite this

Benchmarking the performance of plane-wave vs. localized orbital basis set methods in DFT modeling of metal surface : a case study for Fe-(110). / Adhikari, Kapil; Chakrabarty, Aurab; Bouhali, Othmane; Mousseau, Normand; Becquart, Charlotte S.; El-Mellouhi, Fadwa.

In: Journal of Computational Science, Vol. 29, 01.11.2018, p. 163-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d507c1dc2ff14f1cb116a743290033dd,
title = "Benchmarking the performance of plane-wave vs. localized orbital basis set methods in DFT modeling of metal surface: a case study for Fe-(110)",
abstract = "Reproducing electronic structure of extended metallic systems is computationally demanding with the cost efficiency of this approach heavily dependent on both the density functional and the basis function used to approximate the electronic orbitals. It is well known that the generalized gradient approximation functional (GGA) is the most suitable and reliable approach for the description of metallic systems. As for the basis functions, two approaches dominate: the linear combination of localized basis functions (LB) such as Gaussian functions and the linear combination of plane waves (PW). Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, that may impact the efficiency and accuracy of the simulations. In this work, we use the VASP and the CRYSTAL14 suites of codes that employ plane waves and localized Gaussian basis sets, respectively, to establish a benchmark on their computational efficiency for the modeling of metal surfaces. The PW basis technique requires that the entire simulation box including the vacuum space be filled with plane waves which reduces the computational efficiency and limits the vacuum space. For its part, the LB method is based on atomic localized orbitals and does not require vacuum to model surfaces. Therefore, for calculations that require relatively large vacuum thickness such as modeling of adsorption, the LB method might be superior in terms of computational expense while providing the comparable accuracy.",
keywords = "CRYSTAL, Density functional theory, Localized basis sets, Metallic surfaces, Planewave basis sets, VASP",
author = "Kapil Adhikari and Aurab Chakrabarty and Othmane Bouhali and Normand Mousseau and Becquart, {Charlotte S.} and Fadwa El-Mellouhi",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocs.2018.10.008",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "163--167",
journal = "Journal of Computational Science",
issn = "1877-7503",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking the performance of plane-wave vs. localized orbital basis set methods in DFT modeling of metal surface

T2 - a case study for Fe-(110)

AU - Adhikari, Kapil

AU - Chakrabarty, Aurab

AU - Bouhali, Othmane

AU - Mousseau, Normand

AU - Becquart, Charlotte S.

AU - El-Mellouhi, Fadwa

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Reproducing electronic structure of extended metallic systems is computationally demanding with the cost efficiency of this approach heavily dependent on both the density functional and the basis function used to approximate the electronic orbitals. It is well known that the generalized gradient approximation functional (GGA) is the most suitable and reliable approach for the description of metallic systems. As for the basis functions, two approaches dominate: the linear combination of localized basis functions (LB) such as Gaussian functions and the linear combination of plane waves (PW). Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, that may impact the efficiency and accuracy of the simulations. In this work, we use the VASP and the CRYSTAL14 suites of codes that employ plane waves and localized Gaussian basis sets, respectively, to establish a benchmark on their computational efficiency for the modeling of metal surfaces. The PW basis technique requires that the entire simulation box including the vacuum space be filled with plane waves which reduces the computational efficiency and limits the vacuum space. For its part, the LB method is based on atomic localized orbitals and does not require vacuum to model surfaces. Therefore, for calculations that require relatively large vacuum thickness such as modeling of adsorption, the LB method might be superior in terms of computational expense while providing the comparable accuracy.

AB - Reproducing electronic structure of extended metallic systems is computationally demanding with the cost efficiency of this approach heavily dependent on both the density functional and the basis function used to approximate the electronic orbitals. It is well known that the generalized gradient approximation functional (GGA) is the most suitable and reliable approach for the description of metallic systems. As for the basis functions, two approaches dominate: the linear combination of localized basis functions (LB) such as Gaussian functions and the linear combination of plane waves (PW). Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, that may impact the efficiency and accuracy of the simulations. In this work, we use the VASP and the CRYSTAL14 suites of codes that employ plane waves and localized Gaussian basis sets, respectively, to establish a benchmark on their computational efficiency for the modeling of metal surfaces. The PW basis technique requires that the entire simulation box including the vacuum space be filled with plane waves which reduces the computational efficiency and limits the vacuum space. For its part, the LB method is based on atomic localized orbitals and does not require vacuum to model surfaces. Therefore, for calculations that require relatively large vacuum thickness such as modeling of adsorption, the LB method might be superior in terms of computational expense while providing the comparable accuracy.

KW - CRYSTAL

KW - Density functional theory

KW - Localized basis sets

KW - Metallic surfaces

KW - Planewave basis sets

KW - VASP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056485652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056485652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.10.008

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 163

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Computational Science

JF - Journal of Computational Science

SN - 1877-7503

ER -