Algorithm Versus Cut-Point Derived PTSD in Ex-Prisoners of War

Joan M. Cook, Richard Thompson, James C. Coyne, Javaid Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared symptom-based algorithm to cut-point scoring of the PTSD Checklist (PCL) in a sample of 504 World War II ex-prisoners of war not seeking treatment. There was relatively high correspondence (κ = .80) between the scoring methods; the algorithm identified more participants as having PTSD than the standard cut-point of 50. Receiver Operator Curve analyses revealed that a cut-point of 42 distinguished optimally between the algorithm-defined PTSD and non-PTSD groups. An optimal scoring method might use both cut-point and algorithm, ensuring individuals have the symptoms necessary for a diagnosis and of sufficient severity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-271
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prisoners of War
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Research Design
World War II
Checklist

Keywords

  • Prisoners of war
  • Psychometrics
  • PTSD
  • PTSD Checklist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Algorithm Versus Cut-Point Derived PTSD in Ex-Prisoners of War. / Cook, Joan M.; Thompson, Richard; Coyne, James C.; Sheikh, Javaid.

In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, Joan M. ; Thompson, Richard ; Coyne, James C. ; Sheikh, Javaid. / Algorithm Versus Cut-Point Derived PTSD in Ex-Prisoners of War. In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2003 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 267-271.
@article{e204e44e8ffc46babec826dc604b0838,
title = "Algorithm Versus Cut-Point Derived PTSD in Ex-Prisoners of War",
abstract = "This study compared symptom-based algorithm to cut-point scoring of the PTSD Checklist (PCL) in a sample of 504 World War II ex-prisoners of war not seeking treatment. There was relatively high correspondence (κ = .80) between the scoring methods; the algorithm identified more participants as having PTSD than the standard cut-point of 50. Receiver Operator Curve analyses revealed that a cut-point of 42 distinguished optimally between the algorithm-defined PTSD and non-PTSD groups. An optimal scoring method might use both cut-point and algorithm, ensuring individuals have the symptoms necessary for a diagnosis and of sufficient severity.",
keywords = "Prisoners of war, Psychometrics, PTSD, PTSD Checklist",
author = "Cook, {Joan M.} and Richard Thompson and Coyne, {James C.} and Javaid Sheikh",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1023/A:1025851129948",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "267--271",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Algorithm Versus Cut-Point Derived PTSD in Ex-Prisoners of War

AU - Cook, Joan M.

AU - Thompson, Richard

AU - Coyne, James C.

AU - Sheikh, Javaid

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - This study compared symptom-based algorithm to cut-point scoring of the PTSD Checklist (PCL) in a sample of 504 World War II ex-prisoners of war not seeking treatment. There was relatively high correspondence (κ = .80) between the scoring methods; the algorithm identified more participants as having PTSD than the standard cut-point of 50. Receiver Operator Curve analyses revealed that a cut-point of 42 distinguished optimally between the algorithm-defined PTSD and non-PTSD groups. An optimal scoring method might use both cut-point and algorithm, ensuring individuals have the symptoms necessary for a diagnosis and of sufficient severity.

AB - This study compared symptom-based algorithm to cut-point scoring of the PTSD Checklist (PCL) in a sample of 504 World War II ex-prisoners of war not seeking treatment. There was relatively high correspondence (κ = .80) between the scoring methods; the algorithm identified more participants as having PTSD than the standard cut-point of 50. Receiver Operator Curve analyses revealed that a cut-point of 42 distinguished optimally between the algorithm-defined PTSD and non-PTSD groups. An optimal scoring method might use both cut-point and algorithm, ensuring individuals have the symptoms necessary for a diagnosis and of sufficient severity.

KW - Prisoners of war

KW - Psychometrics

KW - PTSD

KW - PTSD Checklist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242386610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242386610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1025851129948

DO - 10.1023/A:1025851129948

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 267

EP - 271

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

IS - 4

ER -