Active pipeline encroachment detector

Jim Ji, Andrew K. Chan, Leslie E. Olson, Harneet Singh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Of the many pipeline accident causes that occur to oil and gas pipelines, approximately 80% of all the accidents are caused by impacts (mechanical damage) to the pipeline from a digging or excavation activity. The pipeline industry indicates that clearly half of the accidents are caused due to incursion of excavating activities into the buried pipeline right of way and the excavator did not notify the pipeline company or the One Call System of the intent to conduct the excavation activity. In addition, the potential for mechanical damage to be inflicted to pipelines located in or near urban expansion areas has become a major concern for the pipeline owner/operators and government regulators charged with the safety of the community. Recent technical advances have resulted in the development of the General Electric ThreatScan system, which relies on acoustic waves traveling through the natural gas medium pipelines. However, installation and maintenance of such systems are expensive. Other security surveillance technologies also lack some critical advantages for this application, namely, cost effectiveness and sufficiently long working life. Indeed, most existing technologies such as aerial surveillance using automated drones, video cameras and infrared detectors cannot work continuously on battery for more than a few days/weeks. Therefore, low cost, long-life, self monitoring sensors are desirable for localized installation and monitoring of pipeline right-of-way.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference
Pages1276-1288
Number of pages13
Volume360
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventPipelines 2009 Conference, Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: 15 Aug 200919 Aug 2009

Other

OtherPipelines 2009 Conference, Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period15/8/0919/8/09

Fingerprint

Pipelines
Detectors
Rights of way
Accidents
Excavation
Excavators
Infrared detectors
Monitoring
Gas pipelines
Video cameras
Cost effectiveness
Industry
Natural gas
Acoustic waves
Antennas
Sensors
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Ji, J., Chan, A. K., Olson, L. E., & Singh, H. (2009). Active pipeline encroachment detector. In Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference (Vol. 360, pp. 1276-1288) https://doi.org/10.1061/41069(360)120

Active pipeline encroachment detector. / Ji, Jim; Chan, Andrew K.; Olson, Leslie E.; Singh, Harneet.

Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference. Vol. 360 2009. p. 1276-1288.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ji, J, Chan, AK, Olson, LE & Singh, H 2009, Active pipeline encroachment detector. in Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference. vol. 360, pp. 1276-1288, Pipelines 2009 Conference, Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets, San Diego, CA, United States, 15/8/09. https://doi.org/10.1061/41069(360)120
Ji J, Chan AK, Olson LE, Singh H. Active pipeline encroachment detector. In Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference. Vol. 360. 2009. p. 1276-1288 https://doi.org/10.1061/41069(360)120
Ji, Jim ; Chan, Andrew K. ; Olson, Leslie E. ; Singh, Harneet. / Active pipeline encroachment detector. Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference. Vol. 360 2009. pp. 1276-1288
@inproceedings{991b0cc3a0a44e5baab33bd6aa43a45d,
title = "Active pipeline encroachment detector",
abstract = "Of the many pipeline accident causes that occur to oil and gas pipelines, approximately 80{\%} of all the accidents are caused by impacts (mechanical damage) to the pipeline from a digging or excavation activity. The pipeline industry indicates that clearly half of the accidents are caused due to incursion of excavating activities into the buried pipeline right of way and the excavator did not notify the pipeline company or the One Call System of the intent to conduct the excavation activity. In addition, the potential for mechanical damage to be inflicted to pipelines located in or near urban expansion areas has become a major concern for the pipeline owner/operators and government regulators charged with the safety of the community. Recent technical advances have resulted in the development of the General Electric ThreatScan system, which relies on acoustic waves traveling through the natural gas medium pipelines. However, installation and maintenance of such systems are expensive. Other security surveillance technologies also lack some critical advantages for this application, namely, cost effectiveness and sufficiently long working life. Indeed, most existing technologies such as aerial surveillance using automated drones, video cameras and infrared detectors cannot work continuously on battery for more than a few days/weeks. Therefore, low cost, long-life, self monitoring sensors are desirable for localized installation and monitoring of pipeline right-of-way.",
author = "Jim Ji and Chan, {Andrew K.} and Olson, {Leslie E.} and Harneet Singh",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1061/41069(360)120",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780784410691",
volume = "360",
pages = "1276--1288",
booktitle = "Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Active pipeline encroachment detector

AU - Ji, Jim

AU - Chan, Andrew K.

AU - Olson, Leslie E.

AU - Singh, Harneet

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Of the many pipeline accident causes that occur to oil and gas pipelines, approximately 80% of all the accidents are caused by impacts (mechanical damage) to the pipeline from a digging or excavation activity. The pipeline industry indicates that clearly half of the accidents are caused due to incursion of excavating activities into the buried pipeline right of way and the excavator did not notify the pipeline company or the One Call System of the intent to conduct the excavation activity. In addition, the potential for mechanical damage to be inflicted to pipelines located in or near urban expansion areas has become a major concern for the pipeline owner/operators and government regulators charged with the safety of the community. Recent technical advances have resulted in the development of the General Electric ThreatScan system, which relies on acoustic waves traveling through the natural gas medium pipelines. However, installation and maintenance of such systems are expensive. Other security surveillance technologies also lack some critical advantages for this application, namely, cost effectiveness and sufficiently long working life. Indeed, most existing technologies such as aerial surveillance using automated drones, video cameras and infrared detectors cannot work continuously on battery for more than a few days/weeks. Therefore, low cost, long-life, self monitoring sensors are desirable for localized installation and monitoring of pipeline right-of-way.

AB - Of the many pipeline accident causes that occur to oil and gas pipelines, approximately 80% of all the accidents are caused by impacts (mechanical damage) to the pipeline from a digging or excavation activity. The pipeline industry indicates that clearly half of the accidents are caused due to incursion of excavating activities into the buried pipeline right of way and the excavator did not notify the pipeline company or the One Call System of the intent to conduct the excavation activity. In addition, the potential for mechanical damage to be inflicted to pipelines located in or near urban expansion areas has become a major concern for the pipeline owner/operators and government regulators charged with the safety of the community. Recent technical advances have resulted in the development of the General Electric ThreatScan system, which relies on acoustic waves traveling through the natural gas medium pipelines. However, installation and maintenance of such systems are expensive. Other security surveillance technologies also lack some critical advantages for this application, namely, cost effectiveness and sufficiently long working life. Indeed, most existing technologies such as aerial surveillance using automated drones, video cameras and infrared detectors cannot work continuously on battery for more than a few days/weeks. Therefore, low cost, long-life, self monitoring sensors are desirable for localized installation and monitoring of pipeline right-of-way.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449556579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449556579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41069(360)120

DO - 10.1061/41069(360)120

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784410691

VL - 360

SP - 1276

EP - 1288

BT - Pipelines 2009: Infrastructure's Hidden Assets - Proceedings of the Pipelines 2009 Conference

ER -