Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage

C. Saltini, A. J. Hance, V. J. Ferrans, F. Basset, P. B. Bitterman, Ronald Crystal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantification of the differential cell count and total number of cells recovered from the lower respiratory tract by bronchoalveolar lavage is a valuable technique for evaluating the alveolitis of patients with inflammatory disorders of the lower respiratory tract. The most commonly used technique for the evaluation of cells recovered by lavage has been to concentrate cells by centrifugation and then to determine total cell number using a hemocytometer and differential cell count from a Wright-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuge preparation. However, we have noted that the percentage of small cells present in the original cell suspension recovered by lavage is greater than the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations. Therefore, we developed procedures for determining differential cell counts on lavage cells collected on Millipore filters and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (filter preparations) and compared the results of differential cell counts performed on filter preparations with those obtained using cytocentrifuge preparations. When cells recovered by lavage were collected on filter preparations, accurate differential cell counts were obtained, as confirmed by performing differential cell counts on cell mixtures of known composition, and by comparing differential cell counts obtained using filter preparations stained with hematoxylin-eosin with those obtained using filter preparations stained with a peroxidase cytochemical stain. The morphology of cells displayed on filter preparations was excellent, and interobserver variability in quantitating cell types recovered by lavage was less than 3%. In contrast, the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations was 73 ± 29% of that identified on filter preparations, suggesting that lymphocytes were selectively lost during preparation of cytocentrifuge preparations. The magnitude of the loss was variable, and altering the procedures used in making cytocentrifuge preparations did not reduce this selective loss of lymphocytes. In addition, we noted that concentration and 'washing' of lavage cells results in cell loss (22 ± 20% cells lost after 3 centrifugations). This cell loss was variable in magnitude and was not restricted to a single cell type. Therefore, quantification of total cells recovered is best performed by counting an aliquot of the original cell suspension. These observations suggest that the results of differential counts and total counts of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage must be interpreted in the context of the methods used to obtain these data. Determination of differential cell counts on cells displayed on filter preparations and determination of total cell counts on unconcentrated cell suspensions appear to accurately reflect the number and types of cells originally recovered by lavage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-658
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease
Volume130
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Cell Count
Therapeutic Irrigation
Lymphocytes
Suspensions
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Centrifugation
Respiratory System
Micropore Filters
Observer Variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Saltini, C., Hance, A. J., Ferrans, V. J., Basset, F., Bitterman, P. B., & Crystal, R. (1984). Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 130(4), 650-658.

Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage. / Saltini, C.; Hance, A. J.; Ferrans, V. J.; Basset, F.; Bitterman, P. B.; Crystal, Ronald.

In: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 130, No. 4, 01.12.1984, p. 650-658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saltini, C, Hance, AJ, Ferrans, VJ, Basset, F, Bitterman, PB & Crystal, R 1984, 'Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage', American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 650-658.
Saltini C, Hance AJ, Ferrans VJ, Basset F, Bitterman PB, Crystal R. Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1984 Dec 1;130(4):650-658.
Saltini, C. ; Hance, A. J. ; Ferrans, V. J. ; Basset, F. ; Bitterman, P. B. ; Crystal, Ronald. / Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage. In: American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1984 ; Vol. 130, No. 4. pp. 650-658.
@article{caf042f8d15f4e94869c52941da58bd7,
title = "Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage",
abstract = "Quantification of the differential cell count and total number of cells recovered from the lower respiratory tract by bronchoalveolar lavage is a valuable technique for evaluating the alveolitis of patients with inflammatory disorders of the lower respiratory tract. The most commonly used technique for the evaluation of cells recovered by lavage has been to concentrate cells by centrifugation and then to determine total cell number using a hemocytometer and differential cell count from a Wright-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuge preparation. However, we have noted that the percentage of small cells present in the original cell suspension recovered by lavage is greater than the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations. Therefore, we developed procedures for determining differential cell counts on lavage cells collected on Millipore filters and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (filter preparations) and compared the results of differential cell counts performed on filter preparations with those obtained using cytocentrifuge preparations. When cells recovered by lavage were collected on filter preparations, accurate differential cell counts were obtained, as confirmed by performing differential cell counts on cell mixtures of known composition, and by comparing differential cell counts obtained using filter preparations stained with hematoxylin-eosin with those obtained using filter preparations stained with a peroxidase cytochemical stain. The morphology of cells displayed on filter preparations was excellent, and interobserver variability in quantitating cell types recovered by lavage was less than 3{\%}. In contrast, the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations was 73 ± 29{\%} of that identified on filter preparations, suggesting that lymphocytes were selectively lost during preparation of cytocentrifuge preparations. The magnitude of the loss was variable, and altering the procedures used in making cytocentrifuge preparations did not reduce this selective loss of lymphocytes. In addition, we noted that concentration and 'washing' of lavage cells results in cell loss (22 ± 20{\%} cells lost after 3 centrifugations). This cell loss was variable in magnitude and was not restricted to a single cell type. Therefore, quantification of total cells recovered is best performed by counting an aliquot of the original cell suspension. These observations suggest that the results of differential counts and total counts of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage must be interpreted in the context of the methods used to obtain these data. Determination of differential cell counts on cells displayed on filter preparations and determination of total cell counts on unconcentrated cell suspensions appear to accurately reflect the number and types of cells originally recovered by lavage.",
author = "C. Saltini and Hance, {A. J.} and Ferrans, {V. J.} and F. Basset and Bitterman, {P. B.} and Ronald Crystal",
year = "1984",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "650--658",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accurate quantification of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage

AU - Saltini, C.

AU - Hance, A. J.

AU - Ferrans, V. J.

AU - Basset, F.

AU - Bitterman, P. B.

AU - Crystal, Ronald

PY - 1984/12/1

Y1 - 1984/12/1

N2 - Quantification of the differential cell count and total number of cells recovered from the lower respiratory tract by bronchoalveolar lavage is a valuable technique for evaluating the alveolitis of patients with inflammatory disorders of the lower respiratory tract. The most commonly used technique for the evaluation of cells recovered by lavage has been to concentrate cells by centrifugation and then to determine total cell number using a hemocytometer and differential cell count from a Wright-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuge preparation. However, we have noted that the percentage of small cells present in the original cell suspension recovered by lavage is greater than the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations. Therefore, we developed procedures for determining differential cell counts on lavage cells collected on Millipore filters and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (filter preparations) and compared the results of differential cell counts performed on filter preparations with those obtained using cytocentrifuge preparations. When cells recovered by lavage were collected on filter preparations, accurate differential cell counts were obtained, as confirmed by performing differential cell counts on cell mixtures of known composition, and by comparing differential cell counts obtained using filter preparations stained with hematoxylin-eosin with those obtained using filter preparations stained with a peroxidase cytochemical stain. The morphology of cells displayed on filter preparations was excellent, and interobserver variability in quantitating cell types recovered by lavage was less than 3%. In contrast, the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations was 73 ± 29% of that identified on filter preparations, suggesting that lymphocytes were selectively lost during preparation of cytocentrifuge preparations. The magnitude of the loss was variable, and altering the procedures used in making cytocentrifuge preparations did not reduce this selective loss of lymphocytes. In addition, we noted that concentration and 'washing' of lavage cells results in cell loss (22 ± 20% cells lost after 3 centrifugations). This cell loss was variable in magnitude and was not restricted to a single cell type. Therefore, quantification of total cells recovered is best performed by counting an aliquot of the original cell suspension. These observations suggest that the results of differential counts and total counts of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage must be interpreted in the context of the methods used to obtain these data. Determination of differential cell counts on cells displayed on filter preparations and determination of total cell counts on unconcentrated cell suspensions appear to accurately reflect the number and types of cells originally recovered by lavage.

AB - Quantification of the differential cell count and total number of cells recovered from the lower respiratory tract by bronchoalveolar lavage is a valuable technique for evaluating the alveolitis of patients with inflammatory disorders of the lower respiratory tract. The most commonly used technique for the evaluation of cells recovered by lavage has been to concentrate cells by centrifugation and then to determine total cell number using a hemocytometer and differential cell count from a Wright-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuge preparation. However, we have noted that the percentage of small cells present in the original cell suspension recovered by lavage is greater than the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations. Therefore, we developed procedures for determining differential cell counts on lavage cells collected on Millipore filters and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (filter preparations) and compared the results of differential cell counts performed on filter preparations with those obtained using cytocentrifuge preparations. When cells recovered by lavage were collected on filter preparations, accurate differential cell counts were obtained, as confirmed by performing differential cell counts on cell mixtures of known composition, and by comparing differential cell counts obtained using filter preparations stained with hematoxylin-eosin with those obtained using filter preparations stained with a peroxidase cytochemical stain. The morphology of cells displayed on filter preparations was excellent, and interobserver variability in quantitating cell types recovered by lavage was less than 3%. In contrast, the percentage of lymphocytes identified on cytocentrifuge preparations was 73 ± 29% of that identified on filter preparations, suggesting that lymphocytes were selectively lost during preparation of cytocentrifuge preparations. The magnitude of the loss was variable, and altering the procedures used in making cytocentrifuge preparations did not reduce this selective loss of lymphocytes. In addition, we noted that concentration and 'washing' of lavage cells results in cell loss (22 ± 20% cells lost after 3 centrifugations). This cell loss was variable in magnitude and was not restricted to a single cell type. Therefore, quantification of total cells recovered is best performed by counting an aliquot of the original cell suspension. These observations suggest that the results of differential counts and total counts of cells recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage must be interpreted in the context of the methods used to obtain these data. Determination of differential cell counts on cells displayed on filter preparations and determination of total cell counts on unconcentrated cell suspensions appear to accurately reflect the number and types of cells originally recovered by lavage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021742896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021742896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6385789

AN - SCOPUS:0021742896

VL - 130

SP - 650

EP - 658

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 4

ER -