A Conservative Critique of Blacksburg

Phillip Gray, Sara Mattingly-Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article presents a conservative rejoinder to the Blacksburg perspective inviting a more discursive elaboration on the overlaps between key conservative thinkers, such as those from Michael Oakeshott, and portions of the Blacksburg view, specifically from the works of John Rohr and Charles T. Goodsell. We posit a conservative perspective that would contest three points in the Refounding texts. The article concludes by elaborating on the generative role that a discussion between the Refounders and key conservatives plays in positing new avenues for administrative theory and addressing challenges to the discretionary power of civil servants in a constitutional democracy.

LanguageEnglish
Pages725-747
Number of pages23
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

civil servant
democracy
Contests
Democracy
Civil servants
Elaboration

Keywords

  • administrative state
  • Blacksburg
  • conservatism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

A Conservative Critique of Blacksburg. / Gray, Phillip; Mattingly-Jordan, Sara.

In: Administration and Society, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 725-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gray, Phillip ; Mattingly-Jordan, Sara. / A Conservative Critique of Blacksburg. In: Administration and Society. 2018 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 725-747.
@article{edcf705647c74b12b661cc5ca9994fdd,
title = "A Conservative Critique of Blacksburg",
abstract = "This article presents a conservative rejoinder to the Blacksburg perspective inviting a more discursive elaboration on the overlaps between key conservative thinkers, such as those from Michael Oakeshott, and portions of the Blacksburg view, specifically from the works of John Rohr and Charles T. Goodsell. We posit a conservative perspective that would contest three points in the Refounding texts. The article concludes by elaborating on the generative role that a discussion between the Refounders and key conservatives plays in positing new avenues for administrative theory and addressing challenges to the discretionary power of civil servants in a constitutional democracy.",
keywords = "administrative state, Blacksburg, conservatism",
author = "Phillip Gray and Sara Mattingly-Jordan",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0095399718764327",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "725--747",
journal = "Administration and Society",
issn = "0095-3997",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Conservative Critique of Blacksburg

AU - Gray, Phillip

AU - Mattingly-Jordan, Sara

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - This article presents a conservative rejoinder to the Blacksburg perspective inviting a more discursive elaboration on the overlaps between key conservative thinkers, such as those from Michael Oakeshott, and portions of the Blacksburg view, specifically from the works of John Rohr and Charles T. Goodsell. We posit a conservative perspective that would contest three points in the Refounding texts. The article concludes by elaborating on the generative role that a discussion between the Refounders and key conservatives plays in positing new avenues for administrative theory and addressing challenges to the discretionary power of civil servants in a constitutional democracy.

AB - This article presents a conservative rejoinder to the Blacksburg perspective inviting a more discursive elaboration on the overlaps between key conservative thinkers, such as those from Michael Oakeshott, and portions of the Blacksburg view, specifically from the works of John Rohr and Charles T. Goodsell. We posit a conservative perspective that would contest three points in the Refounding texts. The article concludes by elaborating on the generative role that a discussion between the Refounders and key conservatives plays in positing new avenues for administrative theory and addressing challenges to the discretionary power of civil servants in a constitutional democracy.

KW - administrative state

KW - Blacksburg

KW - conservatism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044345484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044345484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0095399718764327

DO - 10.1177/0095399718764327

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 725

EP - 747

JO - Administration and Society

T2 - Administration and Society

JF - Administration and Society

SN - 0095-3997

IS - 5

ER -