A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data

Sanjay Chawla, Shashi Shekhar, Weili Wu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A spatial metric, which can be used to systematically calculate the regularization parameter in an MRF formulation of a spatial classification problem was proposed. The standard way to measure classification accuracy is to calculate the percentage of correctly classified objects. Spatial accuracy achieved by classical regression, Spatial Autoregressive Regression (SAR), and Markov Random Field (MRF_hMETIS) was compared using Average Distance to Nearest Prediction (ANDP). It was observed that spatial regression takes two orders of magnitude more computation time relative to MRF_hMETIS approach using the public domain code.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences
EditorsJ.H. Caulfield, S.H. Chen, H.D. Cheng, R. Duro, J.H. Caufield, S.H. Chen, H.D. Cheng, R. Duro, V. Honavar
Pages245-250
Number of pages6
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002 - Research Triange Park, NC
Duration: 8 Mar 200213 Mar 2002

Other

OtherProceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002
CityResearch Triange Park, NC
Period8/3/0213/3/02

Fingerprint

Data mining

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Chawla, S., Shekhar, S., & Wu, W. (2002). A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data. In J. H. Caulfield, S. H. Chen, H. D. Cheng, R. Duro, J. H. Caufield, S. H. Chen, H. D. Cheng, R. Duro, ... V. Honavar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 245-250)

A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data. / Chawla, Sanjay; Shekhar, Shashi; Wu, Weili.

Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences. ed. / J.H. Caulfield; S.H. Chen; H.D. Cheng; R. Duro; J.H. Caufield; S.H. Chen; H.D. Cheng; R. Duro; V. Honavar. Vol. 6 2002. p. 245-250.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Chawla, S, Shekhar, S & Wu, W 2002, A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data. in JH Caulfield, SH Chen, HD Cheng, R Duro, JH Caufield, SH Chen, HD Cheng, R Duro & V Honavar (eds), Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences. vol. 6, pp. 245-250, Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, JCIS 2002, Research Triange Park, NC, 8/3/02.
Chawla S, Shekhar S, Wu W. A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data. In Caulfield JH, Chen SH, Cheng HD, Duro R, Caufield JH, Chen SH, Cheng HD, Duro R, Honavar V, editors, Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences. Vol. 6. 2002. p. 245-250
Chawla, Sanjay ; Shekhar, Shashi ; Wu, Weili. / A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data. Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences. editor / J.H. Caulfield ; S.H. Chen ; H.D. Cheng ; R. Duro ; J.H. Caufield ; S.H. Chen ; H.D. Cheng ; R. Duro ; V. Honavar. Vol. 6 2002. pp. 245-250
@inproceedings{6c0d0f6eed7d4d569fa75f676d263db7,
title = "A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data",
abstract = "A spatial metric, which can be used to systematically calculate the regularization parameter in an MRF formulation of a spatial classification problem was proposed. The standard way to measure classification accuracy is to calculate the percentage of correctly classified objects. Spatial accuracy achieved by classical regression, Spatial Autoregressive Regression (SAR), and Markov Random Field (MRF_hMETIS) was compared using Average Distance to Nearest Prediction (ANDP). It was observed that spatial regression takes two orders of magnitude more computation time relative to MRF_hMETIS approach using the public domain code.",
author = "Sanjay Chawla and Shashi Shekhar and Weili Wu",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
isbn = "0970789017",
volume = "6",
pages = "245--250",
editor = "J.H. Caulfield and S.H. Chen and H.D. Cheng and R. Duro and J.H. Caufield and S.H. Chen and H.D. Cheng and R. Duro and V. Honavar",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparison of Markov Random Field and Spatial Regression Models for Mining Geospatial Data

AU - Chawla, Sanjay

AU - Shekhar, Shashi

AU - Wu, Weili

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - A spatial metric, which can be used to systematically calculate the regularization parameter in an MRF formulation of a spatial classification problem was proposed. The standard way to measure classification accuracy is to calculate the percentage of correctly classified objects. Spatial accuracy achieved by classical regression, Spatial Autoregressive Regression (SAR), and Markov Random Field (MRF_hMETIS) was compared using Average Distance to Nearest Prediction (ANDP). It was observed that spatial regression takes two orders of magnitude more computation time relative to MRF_hMETIS approach using the public domain code.

AB - A spatial metric, which can be used to systematically calculate the regularization parameter in an MRF formulation of a spatial classification problem was proposed. The standard way to measure classification accuracy is to calculate the percentage of correctly classified objects. Spatial accuracy achieved by classical regression, Spatial Autoregressive Regression (SAR), and Markov Random Field (MRF_hMETIS) was compared using Average Distance to Nearest Prediction (ANDP). It was observed that spatial regression takes two orders of magnitude more computation time relative to MRF_hMETIS approach using the public domain code.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642329906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642329906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0970789017

VL - 6

SP - 245

EP - 250

BT - Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Information Sciences

A2 - Caulfield, J.H.

A2 - Chen, S.H.

A2 - Cheng, H.D.

A2 - Duro, R.

A2 - Caufield, J.H.

A2 - Chen, S.H.

A2 - Cheng, H.D.

A2 - Duro, R.

A2 - Honavar, V.

ER -